
The AP's Washington bureau chief's bias for one of the candidates is pretty well documented even if not admitted. In addition to Fourniers "coverage" and "analysis" he was in talks with the McCain operation to join McCain's paid full time staff.
Despite declining to officially join McCain's official staff Fournier presents his pro-McCain opinions and spin and presents it under "analysis."
Fournier isn't exactly a neutral observer. I get it. But given Fournier's recent history -- he actually considered joining the McCain campaign's payroll last year -- one would like to think he'd take steps to bolster his journalistic credibility and objectivity. As the criticism has grown louder, even from mainstream news outlets, it stands to reason that Fournier would go out of his way to clean up his act.
He is, regrettably, doing the exact opposite.
"Barack Obama is my candidate," she said. "And he must be our president." But did she mean it? And would it matter?
True, her challenges Tuesday night were impossibly high, perhaps mutually exclusive.
This isnt "analysis" as much as it is opinion. The fact that the AP presents this McCain campaign framing of Clinton's speach as analysis is misleading and extremely poor judgement.
The opinion of Ron Fournier is obvious. If he cant keep his opinion from his job, he should recuse himself. "Impossibly high" is totally subjective and totally unsubstated opinion and framing it as such is EXACTLY the same way the McCain campaign wants to. His doing from the AP instead of his staff just makes it more misleading and cheap.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |